In pesticide drifts onto a non-target area, causing injury or economic loss, the applicator is legally responsible.

When pesticide drift occurs, it refers to the unintended movement of pesticide spray away from the intended treatment area, which can result in contamination and potentially harmful effects on non-target plants, animals, or humans. Legal responsibility in such cases typically falls on the applicator, as they are expected to follow guidelines and regulations for safe pesticide application.

This idea is rooted in the principles of product labeling and applicator responsibility. Applicators are trained to use pesticides according to specific instructions that include precautions to minimize drift. If drift leads to injury or economic loss, it demonstrates a failure to adhere to those practices. Consequently, the applicator can be held liable for any damage caused by their actions, reinforcing the importance of compliance with safety protocols and regulations to protect both their reputation and the environment.

Thus, the correct answer reflects that the applicator bears legal responsibility for any negative consequences that result from pesticide drift onto non-target areas.